6.75

2015-16 EuroLeague · Top 16 · Fri, 25 Mar 2016

Fenerbahce Tarfin Istanbul at Cedevita Zagreb

59–89Final, away–home

Box score

Cedevita Zagreb

PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-FG3PFT
Luka Babic *276410030+262-71-41-2
James White *2611553012+302-50-07-8
Marko Arapovic *2518401122+137-121-33-4
Jacob Pullen *2210033010+183-61-23-4
Miro Bilan *1915521003+276-72-21-2
Fran Pilepic188210022+123-42-30-0
Toni Katic187240032+120-10-17-7
Luka Zoric176300013+72-60-02-2
Karlo Zganec170902012+110-20-00-0
Dzanan Musa64310012−22-20-00-0
Lovro Mazalin44000000−41-10-02-3
Team2008937171011518+3028-537-1526-32

Fenerbahce Tarfin Istanbul

PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-FG3PFT
Pero Antic *286600023−202-81-31-2
Ricky Hickman *259330021−264-81-30-0
Luigi Datome *213400002−161-50-21-2
Ekpe Udoh *2111311132−234-110-03-3
Berk Ugurlu *167101003−83-40-11-2
Nikola Kalinic278521014−164-60-20-0
Melih Mahmutoglu176011014−82-52-50-0
Bobby Dixon140110003−150-40-20-0
Bogdan Bogdanovic146400041−172-40-22-3
Baris Hersek132101002−51-40-20-0
Egehan Arna41100000+40-20-11-2
Team20059298511325−3023-614-239-14

* Starter. The team's +/- is its final margin. Scores read away–home.

Win probability

The home team's chance of winning at each point of the game, from the pre-game forecast at tip-off to the result at the final buzzer. Hover or tap the line to read a point.

100%50%0%Q1Q2Q3Q4

Home at the top. Vertical rules mark the quarters and any overtime. Model: WP v1, the in-game win-probability model, with its card and results on GitHub.

Biggest swings

  1. Q2 05:02Three-point make, Fenerbahce Tarfin Istanbul+8.0 pp for Fenerbahce Tarfin Istanbul20–32
  2. Q2 01:38Three-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+7.9 pp for Cedevita Zagreb25–40
  3. Q1 04:37Three-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+7.9 pp for Cedevita Zagreb7–13
  4. Q2 08:57Three-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+7.1 pp for Cedevita Zagreb16–25
  5. Q2 04:23Three-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+7.0 pp for Cedevita Zagreb20–35

Change in win chance at the scoring play, read at the same clock. Scores read away–home after the play. pp is percentage points.

Game control

PartCedevita ZagrebFenerbahce Tarfin Istanbul
Dominance+0.37−0.37
Control58%28%
Drama1.421.42
Comeback82%100%
Crunch0.000.00

Dominance: the average lead in win chance, from −1 to +1. Control: the share of the game with a win chance above 60%. Drama: the total movement of the line. Comeback: 100% minus the lowest win chance. Crunch: the total movement in the last five minutes of regulation. The 60% and five-minute values are display conventions.

Scoring runs

A scoring run is a stretch of points by one team that the other team does not interrupt. The top three runs of each team, by points, are below.

Cedevita Zagreb

  1. +8 Q2 08:57 to Q2 07:33 16–22 to 16–30
  2. +7 Q3 04:32 to Q3 02:56 38–60 to 38–67
  3. +6 Q1 07:37 to Q1 06:46 3–0 to 3–6

Fenerbahce Tarfin Istanbul

  1. +4 Q2 02:56 to Q2 02:34 21–37 to 25–37
  2. +3 Q1 08:43 to Q1 08:43 0–0 to 3–0
  3. +3 Q2 10:00 to Q2 09:41 13–22 to 16–22