2015-16 EuroLeague · Regular season, round 2 · Thu, 22 Oct 2015
Limoges CSP at Cedevita Zagreb
84–80Final, away–home
Box score
Cedevita Zagreb
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James White * | 36 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −5 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| Luka Babic * | 31 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | +2 | 4-10 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| Miro Bilan * | 31 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | +8 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 7-10 |
| Nemanja Gordic * | 21 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | −15 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Marko Arapovic * | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | −12 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Jacob Pullen | 28 | 21 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +7 | 8-15 | 2-7 | 3-5 |
| Karlo Zganec | 16 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | −6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| Tomislav Zubcic | 14 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | +1 | 1-7 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| Fran Pilepic | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Team | 200 | 80 | 34 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 17 | 23 | −4 | 30-64 | 6-28 | 14-19 |
Limoges CSP
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heiko Schaffartzik * | 32 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | −3 | 4-9 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Nobel Boungou-Colo * | 31 | 15 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 4-4 |
| Leo Westermann * | 31 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | +4 | 4-9 | 4-8 | 3-4 |
| Will Daniels * | 28 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | +6 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| Ali Traore * | 19 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | +8 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2-4 |
| Mark Payne | 23 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +6 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| Frejus Zerbo | 18 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | −5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| Randy Culpepper | 18 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +4 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 1-2 |
| Team | 200 | 84 | 28 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 14 | 21 | +4 | 29-57 | 12-27 | 14-21 |
* Starter. The team's +/- is its final margin. Scores read away–home.
Win probability
The home team's chance of winning at each point of the game, from the pre-game forecast at tip-off to the result at the final buzzer. Hover or tap the line to read a point.
Home at the top. Vertical rules mark the quarters and any overtime. Model: WP v1, the in-game win-probability model, with its card and results on GitHub.
Biggest swings
- Q4 00:39Two-point make, Limoges CSP+28.0 pp for Limoges CSP79–78
- Q4 00:21Two-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+27.6 pp for Cedevita Zagreb81–80
- Q4 02:16Three-point make, Limoges CSP+26.0 pp for Limoges CSP77–72
- Q4 02:59Three-point make, Limoges CSP+24.3 pp for Limoges CSP74–70
- Q4 03:25Three-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+22.3 pp for Cedevita Zagreb71–70
Change in win chance at the scoring play, read at the same clock. Scores read away–home after the play. pp is percentage points.
Game control
| Part | Cedevita Zagreb | Limoges CSP |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance | −0.11 | +0.11 |
| Control | 8% | 35% |
| Drama | 3.35 | 3.35 |
| Comeback | 89% | 73% |
| Crunch | 2.98 | 2.98 |
Dominance: the average lead in win chance, from −1 to +1. Control: the share of the game with a win chance above 60%. Drama: the total movement of the line. Comeback: 100% minus the lowest win chance. Crunch: the total movement in the last five minutes of regulation. The 60% and five-minute values are display conventions.
Scoring runs
A scoring run is a stretch of points by one team that the other team does not interrupt. The top three runs of each team, by points, are below.
Cedevita Zagreb
- +10 Q3 09:28 to Q3 08:05 44–32 to 44–42
- +6 Q4 04:11 to Q4 03:25 71–64 to 71–70
- +6 Q4 02:04 to Q4 02:00 77–72 to 77–78
Limoges CSP
- +11 Q1 05:05 to Q1 01:46 14–15 to 25–15
- +7 Q3 01:53 to Q3 00:39 52–51 to 59–51
- +6 Q2 03:34 to Q2 01:53 35–30 to 41–30