6.75

2015-16 EuroLeague · Top 16 · Thu, 4 Feb 2016

Panathinaikos AKTOR Athens at Cedevita Zagreb

78–60Final, away–home

Box score

Cedevita Zagreb

PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-FG3PFT
Karlo Zganec *218422024−73-40-02-2
James White *214301021−202-80-20-0
Miro Bilan *209300024−74-80-11-2
Toni Katic *102231000−10-10-02-2
Dzanan Musa *50110011+20-50-20-0
Fran Pilepic2716221012−106-114-70-0
Henry Walker227501111−52-72-41-2
Jacob Pullen195100020−172-71-40-0
Lovro Mazalin197200011+23-30-01-1
Marko Arapovic192111011−231-70-30-1
Nemanja Gordic150241031−40-10-00-0
Team200602613811616−1823-627-237-10

Panathinaikos AKTOR Athens

PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-FG3PFT
Nick Calathes *34102101042+204-52-20-0
James Feldeine *298350021+263-92-40-0
James Gist *2510722112+104-82-30-0
Sasha Pavlovic *226100012+183-70-10-0
Ognjen Kuzmic *178101133−13-50-02-3
Vladimir Jankovic194322011−22-40-10-0
Miroslav Raduljica1821331023+219-110-03-3
Antonis Fotsis186700000+92-52-40-0
Dimitris Diamantidis143120034−51-30-21-1
Eleftherios Bochoridis20000001−30-00-00-0
Georgios Papagiannis22100000−31-10-00-0
Team200782924721719+1832-588-176-7

* Starter. The team's +/- is its final margin. Scores read away–home.

Win probability

The home team's chance of winning at each point of the game, from the pre-game forecast at tip-off to the result at the final buzzer. Hover or tap the line to read a point.

100%50%0%Q1Q2Q3Q4

Home at the top. Vertical rules mark the quarters and any overtime. Model: WP v1, the in-game win-probability model, with its card and results on GitHub.

Biggest swings

  1. Q2 04:34Three-point make, Panathinaikos AKTOR Athens+7.6 pp for Panathinaikos AKTOR Athens25–16
  2. Q1 01:55Three-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+6.3 pp for Cedevita Zagreb14–13
  3. Q2 09:40Two-point make, Panathinaikos AKTOR Athens+5.5 pp for Panathinaikos AKTOR Athens20–13
  4. Q2 09:22Two-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+5.5 pp for Cedevita Zagreb20–15
  5. Q1 08:29Two-point make, Cedevita Zagreb+5.5 pp for Cedevita Zagreb3–2

Change in win chance at the scoring play, read at the same clock. Scores read away–home after the play. pp is percentage points.

Game control

PartCedevita ZagrebPanathinaikos AKTOR Athens
Dominance−0.64+0.64
Control0%80%
Drama0.950.95
Comeback100%49%
Crunch0.000.00

Dominance: the average lead in win chance, from −1 to +1. Control: the share of the game with a win chance above 60%. Drama: the total movement of the line. Comeback: 100% minus the lowest win chance. Crunch: the total movement in the last five minutes of regulation. The 60% and five-minute values are display conventions.

Scoring runs

A scoring run is a stretch of points by one team that the other team does not interrupt. The top three runs of each team, by points, are below.

Cedevita Zagreb

  1. +8 Q4 03:38 to Q4 01:11 76–50 to 76–58
  2. +6 Q4 07:24 to Q4 06:28 66–41 to 66–47
  3. +5 Q1 02:29 to Q1 01:55 14–8 to 14–13

Panathinaikos AKTOR Athens

  1. +7 Q2 05:14 to Q2 04:13 20–16 to 27–16
  2. +7 Q2 02:53 to Q2 01:43 27–18 to 34–18
  3. +7 Q3 07:38 to Q3 06:03 42–24 to 49–24